CASE 01Woman · mixed pitted scars
Home/Clinical cases and patient reviews
CLINICAL CASES · VERIFIED VISITS
Acne-scar before and after photos and
real patient reviews
Review ten years of Han Cheong Woo's scar and skin-recovery practice, three pitted-scar records and two acne or red-mark records from the same institution before its name and address change, and ten verified Naver Place visitor reviews in one place.
10 YEARS · CLINICAL CONTINUITY
Ten years of clinical experience,
Ten years of clinical experience,
shown through real records and patient experiences
RECOVER Clinic Gangnam is the same medical institution continued from Gyurim Korean Medicine Clinic under a new name and address. Han Cheong Woo's ten years of scar and skin-recovery practice and the clinical records from before the name change remain on one institutional line.
10 yearsScar and skin-recovery practice
Same medical institutionContinuity through the name and address change
Source-linkedNaver booking and receipt-verified reviews
BEFORE & AFTER · LEGACY CLINICAL RECORDS
Three pitted-scar records and two acne or red-mark records from the same institution before its name and address change
Only the patient-photo areas were cropped from the material published before the name change, and the original and the file published here were confirmed to be the identical image. No skin retouching, color grading, relighting, or generative editing was applied.
CASE 02Man · deep pitted scars
CASE 03Man · severe acne scars and pores
CASE 04Woman · inflammatory acne
CASE 05Woman · acne and red marks
Comparison note These records predate the scar-dedicated capture rig that RECOVER built in-house and installed in the Gangnam clinic. Timing, lighting, angle, and expression differ by case and can affect appearance; individual outcomes vary with scar structure and skin response. Saesalchim and needle procedures can cause side effects such as pain, redness, bruising, swelling, bleeding, pigmentation, or infection.
NAVER VERIFIED VISITS
Ten verified visitor reviews from Naver Place before the name change
All ten reviews are visit-verified through Naver booking or receipt records, and six were left by returning patients. Visit dates, visit counts, and verification methods were checked directly against the Naver Place originals on August 20, 2026, and the breakdown below counts only what the published excerpts actually state.
- Visit verification
- 10 reviews9 bookings · 1 receipt
- Returning-patient reviews
- 6 reviewsUp to an 11th visit
- Scar consultation and procedure experience
- 5 reviewsScar assessment, precision, and answered questions
“The doctor looked at each scar shape … and explained it clearly.”
“At the first consultation, the depth and shape of my scars were considered … and the detailed explanation gave me confidence.”
“I could feel how meticulous and precise the doctor was with each part of the procedure.”
“I asked many questions about my condition, and each one was answered professionally … which gave me more confidence in the doctor.”
“There was no pressure toward an expensive package or unnecessary procedure, which made me feel at ease.”
“I felt much better after acupuncture, heat care, and electrical stimulation … the consultation was good and gave me confidence.”
“They administered the acupuncture kindly, checked where it hurt, and I left after receiving good care.”
“The doctor is kind, the waiting area is comfortable, and the body-composition check is thorough.”
“The kindest clinic or hospital I have visited.”
“The doctor spoke very kindly, and I had a good consultation.”
Reviews describe individual experiences, and outcomes vary. The original reviews may show the institution's former name.
Having seen the earlier records, the next step is recording your own scars on the same standard.
RECOVER CONNECTION
Read the clinical records with their interpretation criteria
Connect the public records to the director's clinical continuity, the scar-structure guide, and the same-condition documentation method.